Transcript
Toggle Index/Transcript View Switch.
Index
Search this Index
X
00:00:21 - Introduction and biographical information

Play segment

Partial Transcript: I’m interviewing Alec Hansen, a lobbyist for the Montana League of Cities and Towns and executive director of that organization in his office in Helena, MT on April 15, 2010. Good morning, Alec. When and where were you born?

Keywords: Alec Hanson; Montana League of Cities and Towns

00:02:07 - Family stories and mourning

Play segment

Partial Transcript: One of the things I remember most about, one of the first things I remember about Butte was when we moved to Butte. I had an older brother, and he was in the Navy, and this was WW2. And he saw some very heavy action off the coast of Okinawa in a carrier task force. And my mother was deeply worried about him, and she’d just lost her husband. And I can remember Christmas of 1945, my brother came home from the war. And I will never forget that as long as I live, when he walked through that door, how happy my mother was. That was just an amazing thing. That kind of just made us all feel like we had a new home and that was Butte. And this is where we were going to live, and we were going to make the best of it. And I’ll never forget that.

00:03:15 - Butte neighborhood and street education

Play segment

Partial Transcript: So Butte was an amazing place, what an amazing place to grow up. There were, in our neighborhood which was called Hub Addition, the area just west of downtown Butte there, there were a lot of families that had a lot of kids. And it was kind of strange in that neighborhood is that a lot of those families, there were no men in the house.

00:05:19 - Irish heritage and ethnic enclaves

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Now your mom was Irish.
AH: Yeah, my mother was Irish and my dad was Norwegian.
BB: But you didn’t know your dad as much so…

00:07:02 - Berkeley Pit neighborhood

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: East Butte, yeah. And then there were, where the Berkeley Pit is now, there were a couple of neighborhoods called Meaderville and McQueen; those were the Italian neighborhoods. They had the great restaurants out there. And the Meaderville Mercantile which was an Italian grocery store. And the people out there Italian, some Yugoslavian and people like that.

00:07:52 - Molly Maguire's toast

Play segment

Partial Transcript: But there’s a thing called a Molly Maguire’s toast that says everything you’ll ever want to know about the ethnic diversity of Butte. It goes: I work for an Englishman, and I room with the French Canuck; I live at a Swedish boardinghouse where a Finlander cooks my chuck; I buy my clothes from a German, and I get my shoes from a Pole; and I put my hope in an Italian pope to save my Irish soul. That’s Butte. That’s the story of Butte.

00:09:06 - Political culture, unions, and the Anaconda Company

Play segment

Partial Transcript: How would you describe the political culture of Butte during that period in the fifties and the sixties?
AH: Obviously Butte was one hundred percent Democratic. You know that’s the big fortress of the Democratic Party in Montana. And you look at Montana now, there are more votes in Ravalli County today than there are in Deer Lodge and Silver Bow County combined

00:10:46 - Copper Strike, Butte Mines, and Anaconda Smelter

Play segment

Partial Transcript: I think almost every three years when I was growing up—there was a copper strike. And those things were devastating. You go on strike and some of those strikes lasted three, four, five, six, seven months. And when you’re on strike you don’t get unemployment, so most of the work force in the town is laid off.

00:13:09 - Legislators; Labor and management division

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Now you know too, do you remember a couple of legislators from the 1950s: a guy by the name of Mervin Dempsey?
AH: Yeah.
BB: And guy by the name of John Cunningham? Do you member anything about them?
AH: I don’t remember Cunningham.
BB: What about Dempsey?
AH: I remember Merv was a very interesting guy. He was a heavy-set guy, and he played golf. He loved to play golf, and he was a pretty good golfer. He didn’t look like he might be. He’s the first guy I ever saw who had a golf cart. And he started to develop glaucoma or something and he wore dark glasses. But Merv was a very sharp guy, and he was in the Legislature. I didn’t follow that stuff very closely until I got directly involved when I work over here in Helena. But Merv, I remember Merv. He was a great guy and his wife Kitty(?). They owned the Butte Copper Shop and they sold these bracelets and things and silverwares. Yeah, Mervin was a really interesting guy.

00:16:44 - Anaconda Company Legislative Influence and Taxes

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: But there were some of those guys. But generally, there were union people that got elected to the Legislature, working guys. And if you look at some of the laws that were passed in the fifties and sixties, you can see where the influence of the Anaconda Company completely evaporated. And you were involved in some of these bills, these personal property tax bills. When that all started, I think there were like ten classes of business equipment property, and the highest taxed item in that entire list was ore haulers, 18 percent. And that is a perfect example of the way that the Anaconda Company lost its influence in the Legislature: when these people can vote to tax ore haulers, which was the biggest part of the operation at the Berkeley Pit, at the highest rate of the entire state, 18 percent.

00:20:27 - Closing of the Butte Mines

Play segment

Partial Transcript: So eventually the thing went, after they sold the thing to Atlantic Richfield, there was no way that they could maintain a viable operation. The environmental cleanup costs at the Anaconda Smelter were 90 million dollars. They had high labor costs, they had…And the ore body had been depleted. There’s still a lot over there, but the good stuff was gone. And the ore grade in the Berkeley Pit was less than one percent copper, so that was a problem. They had huge extraction costs, lots of overburden had to be removed. And you put a pencil to the thing, and it doesn’t work anymore. And so they closed the smelter first, and then they closed the Butte mines.

That was a tragic day in Montana I think because we lost part of our culture, we lost one of the big drivers in the economy and…

00:23:22 - Montana and Democratic Party

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: You’re exactly right. And in fact, back during that period of time, Montana was the most safely Democratic state in the Rocky Mountain region, even including New Mexico. And that was when the mines and the mills were all functioning at more or less full capacity. And many of those blue collar workers were labor union members or Democrats, one or the other or both. And now we see fewer saw mills, we see fewer mines, we see fewer Democratic voters. And in the process, of course, the Republicans have won more elections. And I think you’re right. Jim Murray and some of those guys probably inadvertently contributed to that.

00:24:34 - Fair Trial Practices Act

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: Well, Anaconda had 5,000 employees in Butte, Anaconda, Great Falls, East Helena, and Bonner. 5,000 and those people got paid well. The amazing thing about it is that I know families in Butte that the father would work in the mine, the mother stayed home. And they lived pretty good and they sent all their kids to college. A lot of people don’t understand the economic contribution that the Anaconda made to Montana. It was enormous. You go back and read about the Fair Trial Practices Act and all of that when they shut the state down.

00:25:52 - Influential Names

Play segment

Partial Transcript: A couple of quick names that were key political leaders, I think well more or less during the time you were there. Just any thoughts that come to your mind when I say Frank Reardon.

AH: Oh, Frank. Frank was pretty influential guy. He was in the state Senate; he was an important guy in the town. He owned, I think he owned a hardware store and a plumbing and heating operation down on the flat. And he was somebody that people paid attention to. Another guy, I think is maybe the one guy from Butte that was speaker of the House is…

BB: Ray Wayrynen.

AH: Yeah, Ray Wayrynen. Say that twice. What an amazing guy.

00:29:53 - College and military service

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Probably better move on, although I just find this fascinating. But you’re a young guy, you’re growing up in Butte, and you’re of modest means. But you got an opportunity to go to college. Where did you go and what did you major in?

AH: My father made my mother promise that she’d never let me work in the mine. And when we graduated from high school, some friends and I went on a little rampage. And so we all ended up in the mine. And I worked in the mine for about six months and then…

00:34:33 - Working with Governor Forrest Anderson

Play segment

Partial Transcript: And then Neil Lynch told me…

BB: Neil Lynch, the Democrat senator from Butte.

AH: He told me that the governor was looking for a guy to write speeches and do stuff like that, so I came over and saw the governor.

BB: The governor was?

AH: Forrest Anderson.

BB: What was your first impression of him?

AH: Well, I went into see him, and he couldn’t meet with me because he got stung by a bee and had to go to the hospital. And I was thinking, “My God, he can’t be too tough of a guy.” (Laughs.) So I went downtown and had a couple of beers. They told me to come back at three o’clock. So I had a friend of mine with me, went down and had a couple of beers, come back up and met the guy.

00:40:03 - Executive Reorganization

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: Executive reorganization is kind of an interesting thing. The whole idea is that it would make government more efficient. There were like a 150 boards, commissions, and they were all independent. And the governor had no control. It’s like sometime the cities and the counties dealing with these library boards. You’ve got these independent boards, they pretty much do what they want to do, and then they just come and ask for more money.

00:41:15 - Key Advisors to the Governor

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Who were the individuals that were most influential with the governor? Were there three key advisors?

AH: I think during the time that he was attorney general, he had a lot of good, sharp young attorneys working over there on the staff. A lot of the really good attorneys that I know in Montana have worked for the attorney general. That’s a great experience. Some of the guys that have worked at the attorney general’s office went back to Butte and practiced law. They really had, that’s great training. Duke Crowley who taught a lot at the University of Montana for years there after he left Helena, the governor paid a lot of attention to what Duke had to say.

00:46:40 - Anderson and Mansfield

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: How would you describe his relationship with Senator Mansfield?

AH: Oh pretty good, I think. Mike at that time was a, Christ, he was a majority leader, one of the most influential people in the country. They worked together. But everybody’s always been perplexed about Glasgow Air Force Base. I think that almost put Mansfield crazy (laughs). They worked on a lot of different deals.
Mike Mansfield and Forrest Anderson and a few other guys, they come up with this whole idea of impact aid, like when the federal government’s going to put the facility in. They were going to put the ABM’s in north-central Montana. And Forrest pretty much told them, “If you’re going to put that in then you’re going to have to build some roads, you’re going to have to provide some housing, you’re going to have to do all of these things.” He worked with Senator Mansfield on that.

00:48:36 - Anderson, Metcalf, and Olsen

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Senator Metcalf.

AH: I think they had a pretty good relationship. And I think they admired each other. And they both were attorneys and both tough guys. They had a good relationship. And Senator Metcalf, the relationship between his staff and our staff and the things that we were able to get done, we worked real close with Senator Metcalf.

BB: Congressman Olsen?

AH: Pretty much the same thing. Arnold is a good guy. And when we needed things in Washington, we would rely on Arnold. Forrest quit drinking.

00:50:03 - Anderson and Tom Judge

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Now Forrest Anderson’s lieutenant governor was Tom Judge, who later of course became governor. Your thoughts on that relationship?


AH: That wasn’t so good apparently. They just didn’t get along. They were different guys. And Forrest knew that Tom Judge wanted to be governor, he just didn’t know when. And Forrest didn’t particularly want it to happen right away. When they were inaugurated in ’69—I wasn’t working for him then but I heard this story—Tom Judge was there, and this was a big day in his life. He’d been elected lieutenant governor, he’d been inaugurated, and they were back in the governor’s office, and Forrest says, “I’ll see you in four years.” (Laughs.)

00:53:41 - Anderson and Ted Schwinden

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Ted Schwinden was a member of the governor’s cabinet, a member of Anderson’s cabinet. Did you remember anything about Schwinden in the Anderson administration?

AH: Yeah, they were pretty close. When Forrest got elected, there hadn’t been a Democratic governor in 16 years. And so a lot of the guys that he brought into the cabinet had been in the Legislature, Democratic legislators. Schwinden had been a Democratic legislator from Roosevelt County: Fred Barrett, Gordon Bennett, people like that, people that were affiliated with the party, people that were well known, that Ron Richards had worked with when he was executive director of the party. Schwinden was, I guess it would be the Department of Natural Resources…

01:02:53 - Anderson and Frank Murray

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Briefly, Frank Murray, secretary of state during Anderson’s administration.

AH: Well, Frank and Forrest didn’t have too good of a relationship.

BB: Didn’t have too good?

AH: There’s a good story about that. The new constitution—that’s a strange deal—was very controversial, and it passed by a very narrow margin. And there was a Senate election that year, and more people voted in the Senate election than voted on the question of adopting a new constitution. And so some of the people that didn’t want a constitution argued that the constitution was not approved by a majority of those voting in the election: not the specific election on the constitution, but the general election. And Frank Murray wouldn’t certify it. And so things are kind of held up.

01:04:28 - Tom Haines

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: You told me a great story once about a legislator from Missoula by the name of Tom Haines. Tell that story.

AH: Well, Tom Haines was a state senator.

BB: State representative from Missoula County, Republican.

AH: Yeah, a Republican. And he was chairman of one of the subcommittees that looked at the general government budget. The governor told me, he says, “You know if you’re going to work around here, you need to know how this stuff works.” He says, “There’s the budget for our office, take it up and talk to Tom Haines about it and let’s see if we can get this thing out of the committee and passed. There’s nothing here that’s really controversial. In fact, you should explain to the guy that we found some guys that’ll work cheaper, and you guys are making a lot less than Babcock’s guys were. We’ll go over and get some guys from Butte that’ll work for nothing.”

01:07:01 - Anderson and Bob Woodahl

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: What was his relationship with Attorney General Bob Woodahl?

AH: Not too good. They didn’t get along at all.

BB: Of course Woodahl was a Republican.

AH: There’s some strange things, and you can hear anything you want to hear, but there’d been a lot of goofy stuff going on in Butte that I had covered as a newspaper reporter about gambling and things like that and stuff that was going on in Great Falls. And Forrest had been attorney general and apparently the Republicans were going to use that against him in the ’68 campaign, and for some reason they couldn’t. And so they used it against Gene Daly. And Gene Daly got his clock cleaned and Woodahl got to be attorney general.

01:13:20 - Bill Groff; Jean Turnage; Francis Bardanouve

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Couple more legislators that were prominent during the administration of Governor Anderson: Bill Groff.

AH: That’s something you’ll never see again, a Democrat senator from Ravalli County. (Laughs.) You may never see one of those. You might, I don’t know. Bill was a banker down there, and he was a very sharp guy. He really understood the budget, and he and Forrest were pretty close. In the Legislature you always get down to the last few days and there’s never any money and, “How’s this all going to come together?” Bill Groff and Jean Turnage pretty much could figure that out on the back of an envelope, and they’d work with the governor. And that would be the plan, and everybody’d all map.

01:16:04 - Neil Lynch; Dick Dzivi

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: Neil Lynch.

BB: A Democratic Senate leader from Butte.

AH: Yeah. I don’t know. Neil had some higher aspirations. I think he ran for the Supreme Court one time and was defeated. He was a good solid Democrat, and he was a fairly progressive guy. He had some good ideas, and he could get things done. I don’t think he’s one of the guys that the governor relied on, but he obviously paid attention to what Neil had to say.

BB: Now didn’t Neil replace Dick Dzivi as the Democrat leader in the state Senate? Wasn’t Dick Dzivi the majority leader of the session (unintelligible)?

01:17:32 - Anderson's enemies

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: I’ve asked you about a lot of the associates of the governor and lot about his friends and that sort of thing: lobbyists and legislators and members of his administration. Who were his enemies?

AH: The attorney general.

BB: Woodahl was really an enemy?

AH: Kind of an annoyance more than an enemy. Kind of a guy that wasn’t…Woodahl wanted to be governor. He was out to make as much, make a name for himself any way that he could. At that particular time the word crime scandal came up, and Woodahl saw that as his ticket to move across the hall. Dzivi was brought down from Great Falls specifically to conduct that investigation.

01:18:56 - Enemies: Sales tax with Lucas

Play segment

Partial Transcript: The thing on the sales tax with Lucas, I think Forrest Anderson and Jim Lucas probably respected each other.

BB: Yet Lucas had to feel double-crossed over that sales tax thing.

AH: Well, I wouldn’t feel double-crossed. I’d just feel stupid because nobody double-crossed him. If they’d have passed the bill, he’d have signed it. He said he’d sign it, he’d have signed it. So I don’t think he was double-crossed. I think he was just out-maneuvered. There’s difference.

01:19:53 - Changes in Montana politics

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: Alec, you’ve been a close observer of Montana politics for at least a half a century, and you’ve had several decades representing the League of Montana Cities and Towns in the Legislature. So you’ve had a front-row seat on Montana politics for a long time, longer than most people. That’s a unique perspective. What changes have you noticed in the politics of our state during that period of time?

AH: Initially in the early days, in the fifties and sixties going into the seventies, state government was just totally ineffective. Not totally but it was ineffective, and nobody really understood how it worked. The governor, essentially, was just a caretaker. And you had this madhouse with boards and commissions and things like that that nobody could control. And being governor was a bad job. If everything went wrong, you got blamed for it, but there was nothing you could do to make things go right. And so I think that when things started to change is in the late sixties and early seventies, and there was a very progressive time in Montana. And they adopted a new constitution.

01:24:29 - Urban/rural division

Play segment

Partial Transcript: AH: You used to see Democrats elected out in the rural areas. You don’t see many of those anymore. So that’s what it’s changed. What that kind of leads to, and I don’t think it’s happened yet but there are people that are concerned about it, is this kind of urban/rural division which would really be dangerous for Montana.

01:26:04 - Significant leaders in Montana in the past 50 years

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: We’re close to the end of our tape and just a couple more questions. Who would you consider to be the two or three most significant leaders in the last fifty years in Montana.

AH: Well, obviously the guy I worked for because of the changes.
BB: Forrest Anderson.

AH: Kicking of the progressive era in Montana. Almost too short to be an era, that time didn’t last too long.

Mansfield: recognized nationally for what a tremendous leader he was, what a gentleman he was. When people think about government and politics and what’s good about it, when I have thoughts like that, that’s the guy I think about. He’s a real gentleman and a very prominent, one of the most prominent men in all of Montana. When my mother died—he knew my mom in 1972—he wrote me a letter. Not because he knew me, he just knew my ma and he wrote me a letter. And I cherish that. I will always keep that. And that’s just the kind of guy he was. He was in touch with Montana, but he was up there on the national…Christ, he gave the eulogy at Jack Kennedy’s funeral. That’s how well respected the guy was. Just a good guy.

01:30:59 - Worst leaders

Play segment

Partial Transcript: He’s supposed to be going out, beating the drum, but he’s got to get his seeding done. I think in a way that whole election was a fraud, blaming Gene Daly for a lot of things that he wasn’t responsible for. And they had some money. I mean, they had some things they had loaded up—I think they were going to use for the governor—and they turned it on Gene Daly, who just happened to be a very good friend of mine. Bob was a decent guy, pretty good at attorney general, but I guess I can’t say he’s one of the worst. He’s one of the ones we fought the hardest. I just don’t…naming individuals.

Really the worst thing that’s happened, a lot of times how personal politics has gotten and how divided the Legislature’s become on some of these issues that they really don’t have the power to solve anyway, abortion and things like that. No matter what the Montana Legislature says about those issues, it’s the federal courts that are control that issue. I think that’s one of the things.

There’s just some people that…obviously, whoever let utility deregulation, whoever promoted it, whoever let it happen should spend a night in hell with the devil I think. Because that’s been a disaster for Montana, and that’s just a perfect example when you take an enormously complex issue, introduce it late into a legislative session, and try to get 150 people. That really very few really understand the issue and try to get those people to make an informed decision on a question that’s going to influence the history and the economy of the state for the next century. That’s a total breakdown. Somebody needed to step in there at that time and say, “Now wait a second. Let’s just analyze this thing a little more carefully.” I mean, we had a pretty good setup. It was good for the consumers, pretty decent for the consumers although they bitched all the time, and it was pretty good for the employees. It was good for the stockholders, and it was good for the state of Montana. That whole thing is gone, and it’s replaced by something that functions but it really doesn’t work.

01:32:56 - Montana's future?

Play segment

Partial Transcript: BB: You’ve got that right. What do you see as you look into Montana’s future?

AH: Well, I’m concerned. I’m concerned that a lot of what is good about Montana is going to get lost. The ability for people with differing views to sit down and make a deal. I think the ability to negotiate a compromise is being lost. I think some of our traditions are being forgotten. I think we’re getting…you have to think what it really is to live and work and grow up in Montana. People in this state, it’s a lot of hard work and people, they either come off the farm or out of the mines or wherever they did. There’s this whole tradition of hard work and things like that, and I think what we’re seeing is people come here to retire. And they bring a political agenda from someplace else. Well my family came to Montana, they didn’t come to retire, they came to find a job and I think that’s a big difference.